Archaeology In plain English

The value of a track record in blogging

At the moment I am writing a rather large grant application for a postdoctoral position to step into next year when my current teaching contract at Flinders University runs out. I’ve written a few successful funding applications but this is by far the most challenging application I’ve yet attempted, which is no surprise given this scheme is the major funding program for Australian researchers. For years I have moaned about blogs not being seriously ‘counted’ when it comes to getting jobs or promoted, however at about 2:14pm  on Tuesday in a chocolate inspired burst of writing, it struck me that blogs do serve two important purposes that are critical in the competitive world of academia. Let me elaborate.

This particular grant application is difficult not only because of its scale, but because it requires me to do two things that are each quite difficult in themselves. The proposal must be innovative on a national and international level and firmly locate the idea in relation to a gap that needs attention now. That means it should be academically rigorous, demonstrate a degree of mastery of the relevant literature and meet all the requirements of any major grant proposal, i.e. clear aims, sound methodology and sensible budgets. It also should be carefully crafted for a general academic audience, not of archaeologists but of readers whose specialisations are different to your own. So writing 10 pages of archaeology jibber-jabber won’t necessarily help you get money. You need to convince people outside of your narrow field what your project involves and why it must be funded now.

Meeting both requirements in one document is by no means easy, at least  not for me. But for those who lay awake at night wondering what the point of blogging is, particularly when everyone around you is saying ‘publish or perish’ (and I have made that very point myself), heed my words: having a track record with blogging has been very useful in developing this application, despite my modest and patchy approach to posting.  There are two reasons.

Blogging potentially demonstrates a track record in community engagement and can be utilised as part of a communication strategy to maximise the social benefits of academic research.  If you’re a student or an early career person looking to demonstrate that they have a track record of community engagement, then blogging helps. It shows you’ve been trying to bust open the academic silo, in your own small way, and it also shows that if given the chance (i.e. via a job or large grant), you could easily apply these skills as part of a communication strategy for an organisation or on a large project. That’s important, particularly when it comes to people giving you money. They want to see their investment promoted, plain English blogging helps that and sits nicely alongside formal communication in journals and at conferences and the like.

Blogs also help you to develop your ‘plain English’ writing skills. They allow a great deal more freedom and unlike the real world you can write plain English posts that are accessible to a wider, non-academic audience. I’m an academic and even I find high brow, specialised posts very dull and I’m rarely interested in reading them unless they’re near to my specific field.  A good blog is a readable one and developing that skill is very useful when it comes to convincing others outside of your field about why they should employ you or give you money. So write for people outside of your field.

Publications are of course critical, and without those you are dead in the water so I still maintain that blogs are secondary to this. But they serve a purpose, and if now or in the future you need to demonstrate plain English writing skills or  a track record in community engagement, start  now. If you write about one thing, write about your specific field and the work that you are doing (if I want to read about some new research, I’ll usually read the publications themselves not your blog post ‘covering’ it). Don’t cover the big stories in archaeology if they’re outside your field, for that is the way of two paragraph quotes and blog spam and we don’t need more of that rubbish if we want to make a genuine case about the value of blogging in archaeology.

Related posts

Creative Commons License
Michael Morrison’s Blog by Michael Morrison is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Australia License.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

By admin

I am an archaeologist who teaches in archaeology and cultural heritage at Flinders University, Adelaide (Australia). My research focuses upon two areas. First, the archaeological investigation of Indigenous gatherer-hunter peoples in tropical coastal areas in north eastern Australia, particularly the development of ethnographically documented specialised production systems. My PhD research investigated large mounded shell matrix sites (or middens) at Weipa and I am now working on a collaborative project investigating earthen mounds that also occur in this region. My second research interest is the archaeology and history of cross cultural engagement between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people in the context of Christian missions on Cape York, as well as the social significance of these places to contemporary Indigenous Traditional Owners. In this regard, I am working on several community based projects documenting heritage places and values associated with Presbyterian missions at Weipa.

Prior to coming to working at Flinders, I ran a cultural heritage consultancy business in Cairns, Queensland and also managed several Indigenous land and sea management programs at Weipa, Cape York. I have strong interests in the application of social media and newly emerging web technologies to archaeological research and community engagement.

4 replies on “The value of a track record in blogging”

As another bloggish person who is, at this moment, slacking while writing her own grant proposal I ask: does one put their blogs down in the “major publication” (or equivalent) section of their grant proposal?  See I wasn’t going to do that, it just seems to edgy. Thoughts?

Hi Donna, thanks for your comment.

Well I’m not sure, it depends on your own blog I suppose. I won’t include a URL for this blog in the actual grant application however it will be listed in my CV and referred to in my application as evidence of community outreach. I agree, it is a little edgy and I have concerns about the way  people who aren’t  familiar with blogs might respond to it. I suppose seeking feedback from senior colleagues might be helpful in this situation.

 Nice blogs (I subscribed), worth promoting – so I would add them! I list mine under my contact details (top of page 1) and then provide a brief description as part of the community outreach section. When I applied for my current position, I also talked about blogs and outreach a little and mentioned them in my response to one of the selection criteria.

Comments are closed.